The Financier Mats Qviberg was indicted for aggravated scam on Friday.
He denies:
– This is playing with human lives, says Qviberg’s lawyer Ulf Riser Aftonbladet.
Economic Crimes Bureau did on Friday filed a lawsuit against Mats Qviberg and four other key employees in HQ Bank AB and HQ AB. Qviberg prosecuted for aggravated racketeering, a crime that can give six years in prison.
– The crimes are to judge as rough as they misleading information was likely to cause economic loss to the significant amount of the public who acquired or would to acquire shares in HQ AB, says chief prosecutor Martin time of the Economic Crimes Bureau in a statement.
Writes on Twitter
When Aftonbladet reaches Mats Qviberg he says:
– I will not give any comments, you must go into my Twitter account or talking to my lawyers.
On Qviberg Twitter account states that “it is with great surprise Mats Qviberg received notice of prosecution and his view that the prosecution is unwarranted. “
His lawyer Ulf Riser says to Aftonbladet:
– The indictment is completely unfounded, completely indefensible and totally unwarranted. The prosecutor has throughout the journey was completely impervious to both legal and factual arguments.
What do you mean indecent?
– The entire indictment is based on the is infringement of the accounting and auditing rules, and it does not. We have hired the greatest experts available. They note that there are no errors, and then you should not prosecute.
According to the prosecutor’s crimes to assess as rough?
– Yes, and we ask ourselves extremely requester to everything. We think this is playing with human lives.
According to the indictment has HQBank for profit running his own trading options, an activity that was not recognized under current regulations?
– To be engaged in proprietary trading is absolutely correct. The prosecution says it was not recognized under current regulations, but it is wrong. The greatest experts are notes that there are no deficiencies in the report.
What happens now?
– The prosecution will be tried in court, but hardly over 2015 as it will be a very long negotiation. All defense lawyers are hard been booked. It’s just a guess, but in 2016 I would think that the trial takes place.
What will be the court’s decision, in your opinion?
– acquittal.
For all five defendants?
– Yes, it is my opinion, but I will not speak for more than Mats Qviberg. He has a separate position, for he was not in the bank’s board of directors. He has not been there since 1993, but he was the chairman of the parent company. All errors allegedly committed in the subsidiary bank.
No comments:
Post a Comment