Kaj Persson, ombudsman at Painters’ Union in southern Sweden, defends the union’s decision to take action.
– It’s all about getting to constructive negotiations in terms of pay but also on the work environment and that our apprentices to have a good education, says Kaj Persson, ombudsman at Painters’ union Title 2.
the union had demanded a wage increase of 3.2 percent, while the mediators only offered only 2.2 percent. The union feels that employers want to wind chords payroll, based on performance, which it opposes.
– Employer attack on our piece-is the big sticking point, says Kaj Persson.
In a press release says employers’ Painting companies’ CEO Bjorn Hellman to Painters’ Union through threats and lies trying to dictate the terms of the negotiations.
You want companies that do not use the piecework system will not have a levy, like all businesses now pay. Mudslinging, believes ombudsman Caj Persson.
– I think it’s a foul as they are doing.
He believes the agreement hearing is distinguished by a rare bad relationship with the other party.
– to bad I have not experienced it been before. It is negotiating climate and partly personal errand. It’s a pity.
No comments:
Post a Comment