the Swedish newspaper Expressen revealing that SD’s media company, Present & Future, fake a mångmiljonfaktura to cover over momsproblem can lead to a new criminal investigation.
The announcement came after the first day of hovrättsförhandling in ekobrottsmålet against SD-democrat Martin Kinnunen.
you can of course do if you find reason to believe that offence under public prosecution has been committed, ” says deputy chief prosecutor Jakob Holmberg to investigate the false invoice.
On Monday began hovrättsförhandlingen against Martin Kinnunen, who was the only regular member of the board of the party’s media company, Present & Future.
He was acquitted by the Södertörn district court but Expressen were able to then reveal that he was telling the truth in court when he claimed that he did not receive some signals that the accounts of the company are not managed. Several emails showed that he had the scares of not less than four times, but that he, nonetheless, is not villa to take hold of the issues.
READ MORE: SD’s new fakturabluff – fake dates to cover momsproblem
Fake invoice on the 2.5 million
the Disclosure is now a central part of the vice-chief prosecutor Jakob Holmberg appeal to the Svea court of appeal.
“It has significance for how to look at the subjective side, that is to say, if it has been committed by negligence or with intent,” says Holmberg.
the Expressen, was on Monday also reveal that the company’s bokföringsproblem is greater than those taken up in the criminal investigation. In February 2015, the faking of the company the date on an invoice to be able to squeeze it in the accounts for 2014. The invoice was 2.5 million sek including vat and sent to the party.
READ MORE: Here are seven of the SD’s biggest scandals
“Inappropriate with the same prosecutors’
the Deputy chief prosecutor Jakob Holmberg has not wanted to comment on Expressen’s data, but after Monday’s hovrättsförhandling he said the following on the question of whether there can be a new investigation if fejkfakturan:
you can of course do if you find reason to believe that offence under public prosecution has been committed, he says and adds:
– In general, it is my assessment that it is inappropriate that the same prosecutors have care of all the suspicion that comes up. If it should prove that there is something in it, and that it is a crime so it is more appropriate that any other prosecutors to take the part.
Kinnunen: do not Know the e-mails
Martin Kinnunen – who gave his approval to the fake invoice in the mejlkonversation that Expressen taken note of the – switch in the data:
” There is nothing I know of. I have not seen those e-mails to which you refer. I can only conclude that, in order to ensure that there would not be any problem as we have a number of very much responsibility and mission at the accounting firm.
Your accountant complain time and time again that the invoice shall antedateras, that you should put an earlier date. Did you react not on it at all?
“I have already answered that I don’t know where the e-mails,” says Kinnunen.
Kinnunen: No plans to be judged
If you would be judged here in the Svea court of appeal, does it affect your political mission?
” I can’t see that I will be judged in the court of appeal and will establish the district court’s judgment. I have no plans to change my political involvement in any way.
Even if you could be judged?
” No, I have not.
the Trial of Martin Kinnunen continues on Tuesday in the Svea court of appeal. He denies the offences.
No comments:
Post a Comment